Our GPU benchmarks hierarchy ranks all the current and previous generation graphics cards by performance, including all of the best graphics cards. Whether it’s playing games or doing high-end creative work like 4K video editing, your graphics card typically plays the biggest role in determining performance, and even the best CPUs for Gaming take a secondary role.
We’ve revamped our GPU testbed and updated all of our benchmarks for 2022, and are now finished retesting nearly every graphics card from the past several generations, plus some even older GPUs. Our full GPU hierarchy using traditional rendering comes first, and below that we have our ray tracing GPU benchmarks hierarchy. Those of course require a ray tracing capable GPU so only AMD’s RX 6000-series, Intel’s Arc, and Nvidia’s RTX cards are present. The results are all without enabling DLSS, DLSS 3, or XeSS on the various cards, mind you.
Nvidia launched the GeForce RTX 4090, which as expected leaped to the top of our GPU benchmarks. It’s definitely a fast card, so fast that if you’re not gaming at 4K, you might not need everything it can offer. It followed up with the GeForce RTX 4080, which has the same Ada Lovelace architecture but far fewer shaders and compute. AMD has now followed up by launching it’s own Radeon RX 7900 XTX and 7900 XT, based on its RDNA 3 architecture.
At the other end of the pricing spectrum, the Intel Arc A770 and Intel Arc A750 finally arrived, and while they’re not the fastest GPUs, they have promise and are priced below their direct Nvidia competition while basically tying their AMD equivalents. Speaking of, we also have the Sapphire RX 6700 10GB (opens in new tab) in the list now — we’ll have the review done as soon as we’re able.
Below our main tables, you’ll find our 2020–2021 benchmark suite, which has all of the previous generation GPUs running our older test suite running on a Core i9-9900K testbed. We also have the legacy GPU hierarchy (without benchmarks) at the bottom of the article for reference purposes.
The following tables sort everything solely by our performance-based GPU gaming benchmarks, at 1080p “ultra” for the main suite and at 1080p “medium” for the DXR suite. Factors including price, graphics card power consumption, overall efficiency, and features aren’t factored into the rankings here. We’ve switched to a new Alder Lake Core i9-12900K testbed, changed up our test suite, and retested all of the past several generations of GPUs. Now let’s hit the benchmarks and tables.
GPU Benchmarks Ranking 2022
For our latest benchmarks, we test (nearly) all GPUs at 1080p medium and 1080p ultra, and sort the table by the 1080p ultra results. Where it makes sense, we also test at 1440p ultra and 4K ultra. All of the scores are scaled relative to the top-ranking 1080p ultra card, which in our new suite is the RTX 4090 (at least at 4K and 1440p).
You can also see the above summary chart showing the relative performance of the cards we’ve tested across the past several generations of hardware at 1080p ultra — swipe through the above gallery if you want to see the 1080p medium, 1440p and 4K ultra images. There are a few missing options (e.g., the GT 1030, RX 550, and several Titan cards), but otherwise it’s basically complete. We do have data in the table below for some of the other (older) GPUs.
The eight games we’re using for our standard GPU benchmarks hierarchy are Borderlands 3 (DX12), Far Cry 6 (DX12), Flight Simulator (DX11/DX12), Forza Horizon 5 (DX12), Horizon Zero Dawn (DX12), Red Dead Redemption 2 (Vulkan), Total War Warhammer 3 (DX11), and Watch Dogs Legion (DX12). The fps score is the geometric mean (equal weighting) of the eight games. Note that Forza recently received an update that appears to have dropped performance on Nvidia GPUs; we’re waiting for updated drivers before retesting, in case things revert to their previous status.
Graphics Card | 1080p Ultra | 1080p Medium | 1440p Ultra | 4K Ultra | Specifications (Links to Review) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GeForce RTX 4090 | 100.0% (147.4fps) | 100.0% (188.0fps) | 100.0% (143.2fps) | 100.0% (116.3fps) | AD102, 16384 shaders, 2520MHz, 24GB GDDR6X@21Gbps, 1008GB/s, 450W (opens in new tab) |
Radeon RX 7900 XTX (opens in new tab) | 96.3% (141.9fps) | 93.0% (174.9fps) | 91.8% (131.4fps) | 81.5% (94.8fps) | Navi 31, 12288 shaders, 2500MHz, 24GB GDDR6@20Gbps, 960GB/s, 355W (opens in new tab) |
Radeon RX 6950 XT (opens in new tab) | 96.0% (141.5fps) | 101.4% (190.6fps) | 82.6% (118.3fps) | 61.8% (71.9fps) | Navi 21, 5120 shaders, 2310MHz, 16GB GDDR6@18Gbps, 576GB/s, 335W (opens in new tab) |
GeForce RTX 4080 (opens in new tab) | 95.5% (140.8fps) | 96.6% (181.7fps) | 90.8% (130.0fps) | 78.5% (91.4fps) | AD103, 9728 shaders, 2505MHz, 16GB GDDR6X@22.4Gbps, 717GB/s, 320W (opens in new tab) |
Radeon RX 6900 XT (opens in new tab) | 92.3% (136.0fps) | 100.6% (189.1fps) | 76.4% (109.5fps) | 56.2% (65.4fps) | Navi 21, 5120 shaders, 2250MHz, 16GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 512GB/s, 300W (opens in new tab) |
Radeon RX 7900 XT (opens in new tab) | 91.5% (134.9fps) | 92.7% (174.2fps) | 83.1% (119.1fps) | 68.4% (79.6fps) | Navi 31, 10752 shaders, 2400MHz, 20GB GDDR6@20Gbps, 800GB/s, 315W (opens in new tab) |
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti (opens in new tab) | 88.6% (130.7fps) | 94.3% (177.3fps) | 80.8% (115.7fps) | 67.5% (78.5fps) | GA102, 10752 shaders, 1860MHz, 24GB GDDR6X@21Gbps, 1008GB/s, 450W (opens in new tab) |
Radeon RX 6800 XT (opens in new tab) | 87.8% (129.4fps) | 97.5% (183.3fps) | 72.1% (103.3fps) | 52.4% (60.9fps) | Navi 21, 4608 shaders, 2250MHz, 16GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 512GB/s, 300W (opens in new tab) |
GeForce RTX 3090 (opens in new tab) | 86.9% (128.1fps) | 95.9% (180.2fps) | 75.9% (108.8fps) | 60.9% (70.8fps) | GA102, 10496 shaders, 1695MHz, 24GB GDDR6X@19.5Gbps, 936GB/s, 350W (opens in new tab) |
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti (opens in new tab) | 84.8% (125.0fps) | 94.3% (177.3fps) | 73.2% (104.8fps) | 58.6% (68.2fps) | GA102, 10240 shaders, 1665MHz, 12GB GDDR6X@19Gbps, 912GB/s, 350W (opens in new tab) |
GeForce RTX 3080 12GB (opens in new tab) | 84.5% (124.5fps) | 94.8% (178.2fps) | 72.6% (104.0fps) | 57.0% (66.3fps) | GA102, 8960 shaders, 1845MHz, 12GB GDDR6X@19Gbps, 912GB/s, 400W (opens in new tab) |
GeForce RTX 3080 (opens in new tab) | 80.5% (118.7fps) | 93.6% (176.0fps) | 68.5% (98.0fps) | 53.7% (62.5fps) | GA102, 8704 shaders, 1710MHz, 10GB GDDR6X@19Gbps, 760GB/s, 320W (opens in new tab) |
Radeon RX 6800 (opens in new tab) | 79.9% (117.7fps) | 94.2% (177.1fps) | 64.0% (91.7fps) | 45.6% (53.0fps) | Navi 21, 3840 shaders, 2105MHz, 16GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 512GB/s, 250W (opens in new tab) |
Radeon RX 6750 XT (opens in new tab) | 71.5% (105.3fps) | 90.5% (170.2fps) | 54.6% (78.2fps) | 37.0% (43.1fps) | Navi 22, 2560 shaders, 2600MHz, 12GB GDDR6@18Gbps, 432GB/s, 250W (opens in new tab) |
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti (opens in new tab) | 70.6% (104.1fps) | 86.4% (162.4fps) | 57.6% (82.6fps) | 40.2% (46.8fps) | GA104, 6144 shaders, 1770MHz, 8GB GDDR6X@19Gbps, 608GB/s, 290W (opens in new tab) |
Titan RTX (opens in new tab) | 68.5% (101.0fps) | 84.2% (158.2fps) | 56.2% (80.5fps) | 41.5% (48.3fps) | TU102, 4608 shaders, 1770MHz, 24GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 672GB/s, 280W (opens in new tab) |
Radeon RX 6700 XT (opens in new tab) | 67.7% (99.8fps) | 86.2% (162.1fps) | 51.3% (73.4fps) | 34.8% (40.5fps) | Navi 22, 2560 shaders, 2581MHz, 12GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 384GB/s, 230W (opens in new tab) |
GeForce RTX 3070 (opens in new tab) | 67.7% (99.8fps) | 83.9% (157.7fps) | 54.1% (77.5fps) | 37.1% (43.2fps) | GA104, 5888 shaders, 1725MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 220W (opens in new tab) |
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (opens in new tab) | 65.1% (96.0fps) | 80.7% (151.6fps) | 52.6% (75.3fps) | 38.3% (44.6fps) | TU102, 4352 shaders, 1545MHz, 11GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 616GB/s, 250W (opens in new tab) |
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (opens in new tab) | 62.1% (91.5fps) | 79.6% (149.7fps) | 48.7% (69.7fps) | GA104, 4864 shaders, 1665MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 200W (opens in new tab) | |
Radeon RX 6700 10GB (opens in new tab) | 59.5% (87.7fps) | 78.1% (146.8fps) | 44.3% (63.5fps) | 28.5% (33.1fps) | Navi 22, 2304 shaders, 2450MHz, 10GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 320GB/s, 175W |
GeForce RTX 2080 Super (opens in new tab) | 57.6% (84.9fps) | 73.3% (137.8fps) | 45.3% (64.9fps) | 29.7% (34.5fps) | TU104, 3072 shaders, 1815MHz, 8GB GDDR6@15.5Gbps, 496GB/s, 250W (opens in new tab) |
GeForce RTX 2080 (opens in new tab) | 55.8% (82.2fps) | 70.8% (133.1fps) | 43.6% (62.4fps) | TU104, 2944 shaders, 1710MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 215W (opens in new tab) | |
Intel Arc A770 16GB (opens in new tab) | 54.5% (80.3fps) | 66.0% (124.0fps) | 43.5% (62.3fps) | 31.6% (36.7fps) | ACM-G10, 4096 shaders, 2100MHz, 16GB GDDR6@17.5Gbps, 560GB/s, 225W (opens in new tab) |
Radeon RX 6650 XT (opens in new tab) | 54.1% (79.8fps) | 73.6% (138.4fps) | 39.6% (56.7fps) | Navi 23, 2048 shaders, 2635MHz, 8GB GDDR6@18Gbps, 280GB/s, 180W (opens in new tab) | |
Radeon RX 6600 XT (opens in new tab) | 52.9% (78.0fps) | 72.6% (136.5fps) | 38.3% (54.9fps) | Navi 23, 2048 shaders, 2589MHz, 8GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 256GB/s, 160W (opens in new tab) | |
GeForce RTX 2070 Super (opens in new tab) | 51.8% (76.4fps) | 66.0% (124.1fps) | 40.1% (57.4fps) | TU104, 2560 shaders, 1770MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 215W (opens in new tab) | |
Radeon RX 5700 XT (opens in new tab) | 50.0% (73.7fps) | 66.9% (125.8fps) | 37.2% (53.3fps) | 25.1% (29.3fps) | Navi 10, 2560 shaders, 1905MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 225W (opens in new tab) |
Intel Arc A750 (opens in new tab) | 48.5% (71.4fps) | 61.9% (116.4fps) | 38.6% (55.2fps) | 27.3% (31.8fps) | ACM-G10, 3584 shaders, 2050MHz, 8GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 512GB/s, 225W (opens in new tab) |
GeForce RTX 3060 (opens in new tab) | 47.6% (70.2fps) | 63.2% (118.8fps) | 36.7% (52.6fps) | GA106, 3584 shaders, 1777MHz, 12GB GDDR6@15Gbps, 360GB/s, 170W (opens in new tab) | |
Radeon VII (opens in new tab) | 47.3% (69.7fps) | 60.7% (114.0fps) | 37.0% (53.0fps) | 27.0% (31.4fps) | Vega 20, 3840 shaders, 1750MHz, 16GB HBM2@2.0Gbps, 1024GB/s, 300W (opens in new tab) |
GeForce RTX 2070 (opens in new tab) | 46.1% (67.9fps) | 58.9% (110.7fps) | 35.6% (51.0fps) | TU106, 2304 shaders, 1620MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 175W (opens in new tab) | |
Radeon RX 6600 (opens in new tab) | 45.2% (66.7fps) | 62.7% (117.8fps) | 32.2% (46.1fps) | Navi 23, 1792 shaders, 2491MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 224GB/s, 132W (opens in new tab) | |
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (opens in new tab) | 45.1% (66.5fps) | 58.8% (110.6fps) | 35.1% (50.3fps) | 25.4% (29.5fps) | GP102, 3584 shaders, 1582MHz, 11GB GDDR5X@11Gbps, 484GB/s, 250W (opens in new tab) |
GeForce RTX 2060 Super (opens in new tab) | 44.1% (65.1fps) | 56.3% (105.9fps) | 33.7% (48.2fps) | TU106, 2176 shaders, 1650MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 175W (opens in new tab) | |
Radeon RX 5700 (opens in new tab) | 44.0% (64.8fps) | 59.2% (111.3fps) | 32.9% (47.2fps) | Navi 10, 2304 shaders, 1725MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 180W (opens in new tab) | |
Radeon RX 5600 XT (opens in new tab) | 39.4% (58.1fps) | 53.5% (100.6fps) | 29.3% (42.0fps) | Navi 10, 2304 shaders, 1750MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 336GB/s, 160W (opens in new tab) | |
Radeon RX Vega 64 (opens in new tab) | 38.5% (56.8fps) | 50.2% (94.3fps) | 29.0% (41.6fps) | 20.2% (23.5fps) | Vega 10, 4096 shaders, 1546MHz, 8GB HBM2@1.89Gbps, 484GB/s, 295W (opens in new tab) |
GeForce RTX 2060 (opens in new tab) | 37.4% (55.2fps) | 51.5% (96.8fps) | 27.0% (38.7fps) | TU106, 1920 shaders, 1680MHz, 6GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 336GB/s, 160W (opens in new tab) | |
GeForce GTX 1080 (opens in new tab) | 36.1% (53.1fps) | 47.9% (90.0fps) | 27.5% (39.4fps) | GP104, 2560 shaders, 1733MHz, 8GB GDDR5X@10Gbps, 320GB/s, 180W (opens in new tab) | |
GeForce RTX 3050 (opens in new tab) | 34.9% (51.4fps) | 47.6% (89.4fps) | 26.3% (37.6fps) | GA106, 2560 shaders, 1777MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 224GB/s, 130W (opens in new tab) | |
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (opens in new tab) | 34.7% (51.1fps) | 45.6% (85.8fps) | 26.5% (37.9fps) | GP104, 2432 shaders, 1683MHz, 8GB GDDR5@8Gbps, 256GB/s, 180W (opens in new tab) | |
Radeon RX Vega 56 (opens in new tab) | 34.3% (50.6fps) | 44.9% (84.4fps) | 25.8% (37.0fps) | Vega 10, 3584 shaders, 1471MHz, 8GB HBM2@1.6Gbps, 410GB/s, 210W (opens in new tab) | |
GeForce GTX 1660 Super (opens in new tab) | 30.7% (45.3fps) | 44.1% (82.8fps) | 22.6% (32.4fps) | TU116, 1408 shaders, 1785MHz, 6GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 336GB/s, 125W (opens in new tab) | |
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (opens in new tab) | 30.5% (45.0fps) | 43.8% (82.4fps) | 22.5% (32.2fps) | TU116, 1536 shaders, 1770MHz, 6GB GDDR6@12Gbps, 288GB/s, 120W (opens in new tab) | |
GeForce GTX 1070 (opens in new tab) | 30.4% (44.8fps) | 39.9% (75.1fps) | 23.1% (33.1fps) | GP104, 1920 shaders, 1683MHz, 8GB GDDR5@8Gbps, 256GB/s, 150W (opens in new tab) | |
GeForce GTX 1660 (opens in new tab) | 27.3% (40.2fps) | 39.9% (75.1fps) | 19.9% (28.5fps) | TU116, 1408 shaders, 1785MHz, 6GB GDDR5@8Gbps, 192GB/s, 120W (opens in new tab) | |
Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB (opens in new tab) | 27.0% (39.8fps) | 38.6% (72.6fps) | 19.9% (28.5fps) | Navi 14, 1408 shaders, 1845MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 224GB/s, 130W (opens in new tab) | |
Radeon RX 590 (opens in new tab) | 26.7% (39.4fps) | 36.5% (68.6fps) | 20.3% (29.1fps) | Polaris 30, 2304 shaders, 1545MHz, 8GB GDDR5@8Gbps, 256GB/s, 225W (opens in new tab) | |
GeForce GTX 980 Ti (opens in new tab) | 24.3% (35.9fps) | 33.3% (62.6fps) | 18.6% (26.7fps) | GM200, 2816 shaders, 1075MHz, 6GB GDDR5@7Gbps, 336GB/s, 250W (opens in new tab) | |
Radeon R9 Fury X (opens in new tab) | 24.0% (35.4fps) | 34.3% (64.4fps) | Fiji, 4096 shaders, 1050MHz, 4GB HBM2@2Gbps, 512GB/s, 275W (opens in new tab) | ||
Radeon RX 580 8GB (opens in new tab) | 24.0% (35.3fps) | 32.8% (61.7fps) | 18.2% (26.0fps) | Polaris 20, 2304 shaders, 1340MHz, 8GB GDDR5@8Gbps, 256GB/s, 185W (opens in new tab) | |
GeForce GTX 1650 Super (opens in new tab) | 23.0% (33.9fps) | 36.2% (68.0fps) | 16.0% (23.0fps) | TU116, 1280 shaders, 1725MHz, 4GB GDDR6@12Gbps, 192GB/s, 100W (opens in new tab) | |
Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB (opens in new tab) | 22.7% (33.5fps) | 35.6% (66.9fps) | Navi 14, 1408 shaders, 1845MHz, 4GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 224GB/s, 130W (opens in new tab) | ||
GeForce GTX 1060 6GB (opens in new tab) | 21.9% (32.2fps) | 30.9% (58.0fps) | 16.1% (23.0fps) | GP106, 1280 shaders, 1708MHz, 6GB GDDR5@8Gbps, 192GB/s, 120W (opens in new tab) | |
Radeon RX 6500 XT (opens in new tab) | 20.9% (30.8fps) | 35.0% (65.8fps) | 12.6% (18.0fps) | Navi 24, 1024 shaders, 2815MHz, 4GB GDDR6@18Gbps, 144GB/s, 107W (opens in new tab) | |
Radeon R9 390 (opens in new tab) | 20.2% (29.8fps) | 27.2% (51.2fps) | Grenada, 2560 shaders, 1000MHz, 8GB GDDR5@6Gbps, 384GB/s, 275W (opens in new tab) | ||
GeForce GTX 980 (opens in new tab) | 19.6% (28.9fps) | 28.6% (53.7fps) | GM204, 2048 shaders, 1216MHz, 4GB GDDR5@7Gbps, 256GB/s, 165W (opens in new tab) | ||
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 (opens in new tab) | 19.5% (28.8fps) | 30.1% (56.7fps) | TU117, 896 shaders, 1590MHz, 4GB GDDR6@12Gbps, 192GB/s, 75W (opens in new tab) | ||
Intel Arc A380 (opens in new tab) | 19.2% (28.3fps) | 29.1% (54.7fps) | 13.6% (19.5fps) | ACM-G11, 1024 shaders, 2450MHz, 6GB GDDR6@15.5Gbps, 186GB/s, 75W (opens in new tab) | |
Radeon RX 570 4GB (opens in new tab) | 19.2% (28.3fps) | 28.5% (53.6fps) | 13.9% (20.0fps) | Polaris 20, 2048 shaders, 1244MHz, 4GB GDDR5@7Gbps, 224GB/s, 150W (opens in new tab) | |
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB (opens in new tab) | 18.8% (27.8fps) | 28.0% (52.6fps) | GP106, 1152 shaders, 1708MHz, 3GB GDDR5@8Gbps, 192GB/s, 120W (opens in new tab) | ||
GeForce GTX 1650 (opens in new tab) | 18.2% (26.9fps) | 27.2% (51.1fps) | TU117, 896 shaders, 1665MHz, 4GB GDDR5@8Gbps, 128GB/s, 75W (opens in new tab) | ||
GeForce GTX 970 (opens in new tab) | 18.0% (26.5fps) | 26.1% (49.1fps) | GM204, 1664 shaders, 1178MHz, 4GB GDDR5@7Gbps, 256GB/s, 145W (opens in new tab) | ||
Radeon RX 6400 (opens in new tab) | 16.0% (23.7fps) | 27.6% (52.0fps) | Navi 24, 768 shaders, 2321MHz, 4GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 128GB/s, 53W (opens in new tab) | ||
GeForce GTX 780 (opens in new tab) | 14.9% (22.0fps) | 20.5% (38.5fps) | GK110, 2304 shaders, 900MHz, 3GB GDDR5@6Gbps, 288GB/s, 230W (opens in new tab) | ||
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (opens in new tab) | 13.5% (19.8fps) | 20.2% (38.0fps) | GP107, 768 shaders, 1392MHz, 4GB GDDR5@7Gbps, 112GB/s, 75W (opens in new tab) | ||
GeForce GTX 1630 (opens in new tab) | 11.4% (16.9fps) | 18.0% (33.9fps) | TU117, 512 shaders, 1785MHz, 4GB GDDR6@12Gbps, 96GB/s, 75W (opens in new tab) | ||
GeForce GTX 1050 (opens in new tab) | 10.0% (14.8fps) | 15.8% (29.8fps) | GP107, 640 shaders, 1455MHz, 2GB GDDR5@7Gbps, 112GB/s, 75W (opens in new tab) | ||
Radeon RX 560 4GB (opens in new tab) | 10.0% (14.8fps) | 16.9% (31.8fps) | Baffin, 1024 shaders, 1275MHz, 4GB GDDR5@7Gbps, 112GB/s, 60-80W (opens in new tab) | ||
Radeon RX 550 4GB (opens in new tab) | 10.4% (19.6fps) | Lexa, 640 shaders, 1183MHz, 4GB GDDR5@7Gbps, 112GB/s, 50W (opens in new tab) | |||
GeForce GT 1030 (opens in new tab) | 7.7% (14.5fps) | GP108, 384 shaders, 1468MHz, 2GB GDDR5@6Gbps, 48GB/s, 30W (opens in new tab) |
*: GPU couldn’t run all tests, so the overall score is slightly skewed at 1080p ultra.
While the RTX 4090 does technically take first place at 1080p ultra, it’s the 1440p and especially 4K numbers that impress. It’s only 6% faster than the next closest RX 6950 XT at 1080p ultra, but that increases to 21% at 1440p and 63% at 4K. Against the RTX 3090 Ti, it’s also a major upgrade: 10% faster at 1080p, 23% faster at 1440p, and 51% faster at 4K. (Just in case you check our reviews and notice a difference in scores, note that the above fps numbers incorporate both the average and minimum fps into a single score — with the average given more weight than the 99th percentile fps.)
Again, keep in mind that we’re not including any ray tracing or DLSS results in the above table, as we intend to use the same test suite with the same settings on all current and previous generation graphics cards. Since only RTX cards support DLSS (and RTX 40-series if you want DLSS3), that would drastically limit which cards we could directly compare.
Of course the RTX 4090 comes at a steep price, though it’s not that much worse than the previous generation RTX 3090. In fact, we’d say it’s a lot better, as the 3090 was only a modest improvement in performance compared to the 3080 at the time of launch. Nvidia seems to have pulled out all the stops with the 4090, increasing the core counts, clock speeds, and power limits to push it beyond all contenders.
Stepping down from the RTX 4090, the RTX 4080 and RX 7900 XTX trade blows at higher resolutions, while AMD’s previous generation RX 6950 XT technically takes the lead at 1080p medium where CPU bottlenecks become the limiting factor. We’re looking at updating our test PC (we already have the hardware and some early test results, as you can see in our Radeon RX 7900 XTX and 7900 XT review (opens in new tab)), and it’s a good time for updates as we probably need to retest all of the latest game patches and driver updates.
Turning to the previous generation GPUs, the RTX 20-series and GTX 16-series chips end up scattered throughout the results, along with the RX 5000-series. The general rule of thumb is that you get one or two “model upgrades” with the newer architectures, so for example the RTX 2080 Super comes in just below the RTX 3060 Ti, while the RX 5700 XT lands a few percent behind the RX 6600 XT.
Go back far enough, and you can see how modern games at ultra settings severely punish cards that don’t have more than 4GB VRAM. We’ve been saying for a few years now that 4GB is just scraping by, and 6GB or more is desirable. The GTX 1060 3GB, GTX 1050, and GTX 780 actually failed to run some of our tests, which skews their results a bit, even though they do better at 1080p medium.
Now let’s switch over to the ray tracing hierarchy.
Ray Tracing GPU Benchmarks Ranking 2022
Enabling ray tracing, particularly with demanding games like those we’re using in our DXR test suite, can cause framerates to drop off a cliff. We’re testing with “medium” and “ultra” ray tracing settings. Medium means using medium graphics settings but turning on ray tracing effects (set to “medium” if that’s an option; otherwise, “on”), while ultra turns on all of the RT options at more or less maximum quality.
Because ray tracing is so much more demanding, we’re sorting these results by the 1080p medium scores. That’s also because the RX 6500 XT and 6400 along with the Arc A380 basically can’t handle ray tracing even at these settings, and testing at anything more than 1080p medium would be fruitless. We’ve finished testing all the current ray tracing capable GPUs, though there will be more cards in the near future.
The six five ray tracing games we’re using are Bright Memory Infinite, Control Ultimate Edition, Cyberpunk 2077, Fortnite, Metro Exodus Enhanced, and Minecraft — all of these use the DirectX 12 / DX12 Ultimate API. (Note that we have had to drop Fortnite from our latest reviews, as the new version broke our benchmarks and changed the available settings. Thanks, Epic!) The fps score is the geometric mean (equal weighting) of the six games, and the percentage is scaled relative to the fastest GPU in the list, which in this case is the GeForce RTX 4090.
Graphics Card | 1080p Medium | 1080p Ultra | 1440p Ultra | 4K Ultra | Specifications (Links to Review) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GeForce RTX 4090 (opens in new tab) | 100.0% (161.9fps) | 100.0% (132.8fps) | 100.0% (97.6fps) | 100.0% (53.6fps) | AD102, 16384 shaders, 2520MHz, 24GB GDDR6X@21Gbps, 1008GB/s, 450W (opens in new tab) |
GeForce RTX 4080 (opens in new tab) | 85.8% (138.9fps) | 80.8% (107.3fps) | 74.3% (72.6fps) | 69.3% (37.2fps) | AD103, 9728 shaders, 2505MHz, 16GB GDDR6X@22.4Gbps, 717GB/s, 320W (opens in new tab) |
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti (opens in new tab) | 71.5% (115.7fps) | 65.6% (87.1fps) | 61.2% (59.8fps) | 57.8% (31.0fps) | GA102, 10752 shaders, 1860MHz, 24GB GDDR6X@21Gbps, 1008GB/s, 450W (opens in new tab) |
GeForce RTX 3090 (opens in new tab) | 66.7% (108.0fps) | 58.9% (78.3fps) | 54.9% (53.6fps) | 50.8% (27.2fps) | GA102, 10496 shaders, 1695MHz, 24GB GDDR6X@19.5Gbps, 936GB/s, 350W (opens in new tab) |
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti (opens in new tab) | 65.1% (105.3fps) | 57.6% (76.6fps) | 53.4% (52.1fps) | 49.3% (26.4fps) | GA102, 10240 shaders, 1665MHz, 12GB GDDR6X@19Gbps, 912GB/s, 350W (opens in new tab) |
GeForce RTX 3080 12GB (opens in new tab) | 64.5% (104.3fps) | 56.5% (75.0fps) | 51.9% (50.7fps) | 47.3% (25.3fps) | GA102, 8960 shaders, 1845MHz, 12GB GDDR6X@19Gbps, 912GB/s, 400W (opens in new tab) |
Radeon RX 7900 XTX (opens in new tab) | 62.5% (101.1fps) | 55.5% (73.7fps) | 51.7% (50.5fps) | 48.3% (25.9fps) | Navi 31, 12288 shaders, 2500MHz, 24GB GDDR6@20Gbps, 960GB/s, 355W (opens in new tab) |
GeForce RTX 3080 (opens in new tab) | 59.4% (96.1fps) | 51.7% (68.7fps) | 47.4% (46.3fps) | 41.9% (22.4fps) | GA102, 8704 shaders, 1710MHz, 10GB GDDR6X@19Gbps, 760GB/s, 320W (opens in new tab) |
Radeon RX 7900 XT (opens in new tab) | 56.3% (91.1fps) | 48.4% (64.2fps) | 44.1% (43.0fps) | 41.3% (22.1fps) | Navi 31, 10752 shaders, 2400MHz, 20GB GDDR6@20Gbps, 800GB/s, 315W (opens in new tab) |
Radeon RX 6950 XT (opens in new tab) | 51.5% (83.4fps) | 44.1% (58.6fps) | 39.1% (38.2fps) | 34.2% (18.4fps) | Navi 21, 5120 shaders, 2310MHz, 16GB GDDR6@18Gbps, 576GB/s, 335W (opens in new tab) |
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti (opens in new tab) | 48.9% (79.1fps) | 42.0% (55.8fps) | 37.0% (36.1fps) | GA104, 6144 shaders, 1770MHz, 8GB GDDR6X@19Gbps, 608GB/s, 290W (opens in new tab) | |
Radeon RX 6900 XT (opens in new tab) | 46.0% (74.5fps) | 39.0% (51.8fps) | 34.1% (33.3fps) | 29.8% (16.0fps) | Navi 21, 5120 shaders, 2250MHz, 16GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 512GB/s, 300W (opens in new tab) |
Titan RTX (opens in new tab) | 45.9% (74.3fps) | 40.1% (53.3fps) | 35.9% (35.0fps) | 32.4% (17.4fps) | TU102, 4608 shaders, 1770MHz, 24GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 672GB/s, 280W (opens in new tab) |
GeForce RTX 3070 (opens in new tab) | 45.8% (74.2fps) | 39.3% (52.2fps) | 34.3% (33.5fps) | GA104, 5888 shaders, 1725MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 220W (opens in new tab) | |
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (opens in new tab) | 43.8% (70.9fps) | 38.2% (50.7fps) | 33.6% (32.9fps) | TU102, 4352 shaders, 1545MHz, 11GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 616GB/s, 250W (opens in new tab) | |
Radeon RX 6800 XT (opens in new tab) | 43.1% (69.7fps) | 36.1% (48.0fps) | 31.8% (31.1fps) | 27.9% (14.9fps) | Navi 21, 4608 shaders, 2250MHz, 16GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 512GB/s, 300W (opens in new tab) |
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (opens in new tab) | 40.8% (66.0fps) | 34.5% (45.9fps) | 30.1% (29.4fps) | GA104, 4864 shaders, 1665MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 200W (opens in new tab) | |
Intel Arc A770 16GB (opens in new tab) | 38.8% (62.7fps) | 28.7% (38.1fps) | 26.0% (25.4fps) | ACM-G10, 4096 shaders, 2100MHz, 16GB GDDR6@17.5Gbps, 560GB/s, 225W (opens in new tab) | |
Radeon RX 6800 (opens in new tab) | 36.7% (59.4fps) | 30.8% (40.8fps) | 27.0% (26.3fps) | Navi 21, 3840 shaders, 2105MHz, 16GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 512GB/s, 250W (opens in new tab) | |
GeForce RTX 2080 Super (opens in new tab) | 36.7% (59.4fps) | 31.6% (42.0fps) | 27.8% (27.1fps) | TU104, 3072 shaders, 1815MHz, 8GB GDDR6@15.5Gbps, 496GB/s, 250W (opens in new tab) | |
GeForce RTX 2080 (opens in new tab) | 35.2% (57.0fps) | 29.9% (39.7fps) | 26.2% (25.5fps) | TU104, 2944 shaders, 1710MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 215W (opens in new tab) | |
GeForce RTX 2070 Super (opens in new tab) | 32.3% (52.4fps) | 27.5% (36.5fps) | 23.7% (23.1fps) | TU104, 2560 shaders, 1770MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 215W (opens in new tab) | |
Radeon RX 6750 XT (opens in new tab) | 30.8% (49.8fps) | 26.1% (34.6fps) | 22.2% (21.7fps) | Navi 22, 2560 shaders, 2600MHz, 12GB GDDR6@18Gbps, 432GB/s, 250W (opens in new tab) | |
GeForce RTX 3060 (opens in new tab) | 30.6% (49.5fps) | 25.7% (34.2fps) | 22.0% (21.5fps) | GA106, 3584 shaders, 1777MHz, 12GB GDDR6@15Gbps, 360GB/s, 170W (opens in new tab) | |
Intel Arc A750 (opens in new tab) | 30.1% (48.8fps) | 22.4% (29.8fps) | 19.2% (18.7fps) | ACM-G10, 3584 shaders, 2050MHz, 8GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 512GB/s, 225W (opens in new tab) | |
Radeon RX 6700 XT (opens in new tab) | 28.8% (46.5fps) | 24.4% (32.4fps) | 20.6% (20.1fps) | Navi 22, 2560 shaders, 2581MHz, 12GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 384GB/s, 230W (opens in new tab) | |
GeForce RTX 2070 (opens in new tab) | 28.5% (46.2fps) | 24.1% (32.0fps) | 20.9% (20.4fps) | TU106, 2304 shaders, 1620MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 175W (opens in new tab) | |
GeForce RTX 2060 Super (opens in new tab) | 27.4% (44.3fps) | 22.9% (30.4fps) | 19.7% (19.2fps) | TU106, 2176 shaders, 1650MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 175W (opens in new tab) | |
Radeon RX 6700 10GB (opens in new tab) | 26.5% (42.8fps) | 22.0% (29.3fps) | 17.9% (17.5fps) | Navi 22, 2304 shaders, 2450MHz, 10GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 320GB/s, 175W | |
GeForce RTX 2060 (opens in new tab) | 23.8% (38.4fps) | 19.1% (25.3fps) | TU106, 1920 shaders, 1680MHz, 6GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 336GB/s, 160W (opens in new tab) | ||
Radeon RX 6650 XT (opens in new tab) | 23.2% (37.6fps) | 19.3% (25.6fps) | Navi 23, 2048 shaders, 2635MHz, 8GB GDDR6@18Gbps, 280GB/s, 180W (opens in new tab) | ||
Radeon RX 6600 XT (opens in new tab) | 22.6% (36.6fps) | 18.5% (24.6fps) | Navi 23, 2048 shaders, 2589MHz, 8GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 256GB/s, 160W (opens in new tab) | ||
GeForce RTX 3050 (opens in new tab) | 21.7% (35.2fps) | 18.2% (24.1fps) | GA106, 2560 shaders, 1777MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 224GB/s, 130W (opens in new tab) | ||
Radeon RX 6600 (opens in new tab) | 19.0% (30.7fps) | 15.4% (20.5fps) | Navi 23, 1792 shaders, 2491MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 224GB/s, 132W (opens in new tab) | ||
Intel Arc A380 (opens in new tab) | 10.2% (16.5fps) | ACM-G11, 1024 shaders, 2450MHz, 6GB GDDR6@15.5Gbps, 186GB/s, 75W (opens in new tab) | |||
Radeon RX 6500 XT (opens in new tab) | 6.1% (9.9fps) | Navi 24, 1024 shaders, 2815MHz, 4GB GDDR6@18Gbps, 144GB/s, 107W (opens in new tab) | |||
Radeon RX 6400 (opens in new tab) | 5.1% (8.3fps) | Navi 24, 768 shaders, 2321MHz, 4GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 128GB/s, 53W (opens in new tab) |
If you felt the RTX 4090 performance was impressive at 4K in our standard test suite, just take a look at the results with ray tracing. We knew Nvidia had put even more ray tracing enhancements into the Ada Lovelace architecture, and those start to show up here — though there are still further potential performance improvements for ray tracing with SER, OMM, and DMM, not to mention DLSS3 (which honestly just seems to cause occasional artifacting and doesn’t really feel much smoother).
Even at 1080p medium, a relatively tame setting for DXR (DirectX Raytracing), the RTX 4090 roars past all contenders and leads the previous generation RTX 3090 Ti by 40%. At 1080p ultra, the lead grows to 56%, and it’s nearly 70% at 1440p. Nvidia made claims before the RTX 4090 launch that it was “2x to 4x faster than the RTX 3090 Ti” — factoring in DLSS 3’s Frame Generation technology — but even without DLSS 3, the 4090 is 80% faster than the 3090 Ti.
AMD continues to relegate DXR and ray tracing to secondary status, focusing more on improving rasterization performance — and on reducing manufacturing costs through the use of chiplets on the new RDNA 3 GPUs. As such, the ray tracing performance from AMD remains rather uninspiring. The new RX 7900 XTX basically matches Nvidia’s previous generation RTX 3080 12GB, which puts it just a bit behind the RTX 3080 Ti and RTX 3090. The step down RX 7900 XT meanwhile lands above the RX 6950 XT and just below the RTX 3080 10GB card.
You can also see what DLSS Quality mode did for performance in DXR games on the RTX 4090 in our review, but the short summary is that it boosted performance by 78% at 4K ultra. DLSS 3 meanwhile improved framerates another 30% to 100% in our preview testing though we remain skeptical about the utility of Frame Generation outside of artificially boosting frame rates. That means with DLSS2, the 4090 in our ray tracing test suite is nearly four times as fast as AMD’s RX 7900 XTX. Ouch.
AMD’s FSR 2.0 would prove beneficial here, if AMD can get widespread adoption. Right now, only one of the games in our DXR suite (Cyberpunk 2077) has FSR2 support. Without FSR, AMD’s fastest GPUs can only clear 60 fps at 1080p ultra, while remaining decently playable at 1440p with 40–50 fps on average. But native 4K DXR remains out of reach for just about every GPU, with only the 3090 Ti, 4080, and 4090 breaking the 30 fps mark on the composite score — a couple of games come up short on the 4080 and 3090 Ti.
The midrange GPUs like the RTX 3070 and RX 6700 XT basically manage 1080p ultra and not much more, while the bottom tier of DXR-capable GPUs barely manage 1080p medium — and the RX 6500 XT can’t even do that, with single digit framerates in most of our test suite, and one game that wouldn’t even work at our chosen “medium” settings. (Control requires at least 6GB VRAM to let you enabled ray tracing.)
Intel’s Arc A380 ends up just ahead of the RX 6500 XT in ray tracing performance, which is interesting considering it only has 8 RTUs going up against AMD’s 16 Ray Accelerators. Intel posted a deep dive into its ray tracing hardware, and Arc sounds reasonably impressive, except for the fact that the number of RTUs in the A380 severely limits performance. The top-end A770 still only has 32 RTUs, which proves sufficient for it to pull ahead (barely) of the RTX 3060 in DXR testing, but it’s can’t go much further than that. Arc A770 also ends up ahead of AMD’s RX 6800 in DXR performance, showing just how poor AMD’s RDNA 2 hardware is when it comes to ray tracing.
It’s also interesting to look at the generational performance of Nvidia’s RTX cards. The slowest 20-series GPU, the RTX 2060, still outperforms the new RTX 3050 by a bit, but the fastest RTX 2080 Ti comes in a bit behind the RTX 3070. Where the 2080 Ti basically doubled the performance of the 2060, the 3090 delivers about triple the performance of the 3050. Hopefully a future RTX 4050 will deliver similar gains as the 4090, at a far more affordable price point.
2020-2021 GPU Benchmarks Ranking
The results below are from our previous version of the GPU benchmarks hierarchy, using a different test suite and combining results from nine games with six resolution and setting combinations. All of the scores are combined (via a geometric mean calculation) into a single overall result, which tends to penalize the fastest and slowest GPUs — CPU bottlenecks come into play at 1080p medium, while VRAM limitations can kill performance at 4K ultra.
These results have not been updated since early 2022, when we added the RTX 3050 and RX 6500 XT to the list. We won’t be adding future GPUs to this table, so there’s no RTX 40-series, RX 7000-series, 3090 Ti, 6950 XT, 6750 XT, or 6650 XT, but it does help to provide a look at a slightly less demanding suite of games, where 6GB or more VRAM isn’t generally required at 1080p ultra settings. You can use these older results to help inform your purchase decisions, if you don’t typically run the latest games at maxed out settings.
Choosing a Graphics Card
Which graphics card do you need? To help you decide, we created this GPU benchmarks hierarchy consisting of dozens of GPUs from the past four generations of hardware. Not surprisingly, the fastest cards use either Nvidia’s Ampere architecture or AMD’s Big Navi. AMD’s latest graphics cards perform well without ray tracing, but tend to fall behind once RT gets enabled — even more so if you enable DLSS, which you should. GPU prices are finally hitting reasonable levels, however, making it a better time to upgrade.
Of course it’s not just about playing games. Many applications use the GPU for other work, and we covered some professional GPU benchmarks in our RTX 3090 Ti review. But a good graphics card for gaming will typically do equally well in complex GPU computational workloads. Buy one of the top cards and you can run games at high resolutions and frame rates with the effects turned all the way up, and you’ll be able to do content creation work equally well. Drop down to the middle and lower portions of the list and you’ll need to start dialing down the settings to get acceptable performance in regular game play and GPU benchmarks.
It’s not just about high-end GPUs either, of course. We tested Intel’s Xe Graphics DG1, which basically competes with integrated graphics solutions. The results weren’t pretty, and we didn’t even try running any of those at settings beyond 1080p medium. Still, you can see where those GPUs land at the very bottom of the 2020-2021 GPU benchmarks list. Thankfully, Intel’s Arc Alchemist, aka DG2, appears to be cut from entirely different cloth. We hope, anyway.
If your main goal is gaming, you can’t forget about the CPU. Getting the best possible gaming GPU won’t help you much if your CPU is underpowered and/or out of date. So be sure to check out the Best CPUs for gaming page, as well as our CPU Benchmarks Hierarchy to make sure you have the right CPU for the level of gaming you’re looking to achieve.
Test System and How We Test for GPU Benchmarks
We’ve used two different PCs for our testing. The latest 2022 and later configuration uses an Alder Lake CPU and platform, while our previous testbed uses Coffee Lake and Z390. Here are the details of the two PCs.
Tom’s Hardware 2022 GPU Testbed
Intel Core i9-12900K (opens in new tab)
MSI Pro Z690-A WiFi DDR4 (opens in new tab)
Corsair 2x16GB DDR4-3600 CL16 (opens in new tab)
Crucial P5 Plus 2TB (opens in new tab)
Cooler Master MWE 1250 V2 Gold (opens in new tab)
Cooler Master PL360 Flux (opens in new tab)
Cooler Master HAF500
Windows 11 Pro 64-bit
Tom’s Hardware 2020–2021 GPU Testbed
Intel Core i9-9900K (opens in new tab)
Corsair H150i Pro RGB (opens in new tab)
MSI MEG Z390 Ace (opens in new tab)
Corsair 2x16GB DDR4-3200 (opens in new tab)
XPG SX8200 Pro 2TB (opens in new tab)
Windows 10 Pro (opens in new tab) (21H1)
For each graphics card, we follow the same testing procedure. We run one pass of each benchmark to “warm up” the GPU after launching the game, then run at least two passes at each setting/resolution combination. If the two runs are basically identical (within 0.5% or less difference), we use the faster of the two runs. If there’s more than a small difference, we run the test at least twice more to determine what “normal” performance is supposed to be.
We also look at all the data and check for anomalies, so for example RTX 3070 Ti, RTX 3070, and RTX 3060 Ti all generally going to perform within a narrow range — 3070 Ti is about 5% faster than 3070, which is about 5% faster than 3060 Ti. If we see games where there are clear outliers (i.e. performance is more than 10% higher for the cards just mentioned), we’ll go back and retest whatever cards are showing the anomaly and figure out what the “correct” result would be.
Due to the length of time required for testing each GPU, updated drivers and game patches inevitably will come out that can impact performance. We periodically retest a few sample cards to verify our results are still valid, and if not, we go through and retest the affected game(s) and GPU(s). We may also add games to our test suite over the coming year, if one comes out that is popular and conducive to testing — see our what makes a good game benchmark for our selection criteria.
GPU Benchmarks: Individual Game Charts
The above tables provide a summary of performance, but for those that want to see the individual game charts, for both the standard and ray tracing test suites, we’ve got those as well. These charts were up-to-date as of May 19, 2022, with testing conducted using the latest Nvidia and AMD drivers in most cases, though some of the cards were tested with slightly older drivers.
Note that we’re only including the past two generations of hardware in these charts, as otherwise things get too cramped — and you can argue that with 35 cards in the 1080p charts, we’re already well past that point. (Hint: Click the enlarge icon if you’re on PC.)
Also note that we’ve switched from DX12 to DX11 for Microsoft Flight Simulator testing, partly because DX12 started to have issues recently, partly because DX12 is still listed as “beta,” but mostly because we’ve determined DX11 runs faster — somethings by more than 10% — on most GPUs. We’ve retested all of the cards in DX11 mode now.
Best Graphics Cards — 1080p Medium
Best Graphics Cards — 1080p Ultra
Best Graphics Cards — 1440p Ultra
Best Graphics Cards — 4K Ultra
Power, Clocks, Temperatures, and Fan Speeds
While our GPU benchmarks hierarchy sorts things solely by performance, for those interested in power and other aspects of the GPUs, here are the appropriate charts.
Legacy GPU Hierarchy
Below is our legacy desktop GPU hierarchy dating back to the late 1990s. We have not tested most of these cards in many years, driver support has ended on most of these models, and the relative rankings are pretty coarse. Note that we also don’t factor in memory bandwidth or features like AMD’s Infinity Cache. The list below is mostly intended to show relative performance between architectures from a similar time period.
We sorted the table by the theoretical GFLOPS, though on architectures that don’t support unified shaders, we only have data for “Gops/s” (giga operations per second). That’s GeForce 7 and Radeon X1000 and earlier — basically anything from before 2007. We’ve put an asterisk (*) next to the GPU names for those cards, and they comprise the latter part of the table. Comparing pre-2007 GPUs against each other should be relatively meaningful, but trying to compare those older GPUs against newer GPUs gets a bit convoluted.
These results are, at best, merely theoretical and we don’t have recent benchmarks for most of the GPUs. Take AMD’s new RX 7900 XTX/XT, which sit in spots two and three even though the RTX 4080 generally beats the 7900 XT. Take the following with a healthy dose of skepticism and a liberal sprinkling of salt, in other words.
GPU | Release Date | Architecture | Shaders | Clockspeed | GFLOPS (GOps) | Launch Price | GPU Name |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GeForce RTX 4090 | October 2022 | AD102 | 16384 | 2520 | 82,575 | $1,599 | GeForce RTX 4090 |
Radeon RX 7900 XTX | December 2022 | Navi 31 | 12288 | 2500 | 61,440 | $999 | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
Radeon RX 7900 XT | December 2022 | Navi 31 | 10752 | 2400 | 51,610 | $899 | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
GeForce RTX 4080 | November 2022 | AD103 | 9728 | 2505 | 48,737 | $1,199 | GeForce RTX 4080 |
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | March 2022 | GA102 | 10752 | 1860 | 39,997 | $1,999 | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
GeForce RTX 3090 | September 2020 | GA102 | 10496 | 1695 | 35,581 | $1,499 | GeForce RTX 3090 |
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | June 2021 | GA102 | 10240 | 1665 | 34,099 | $1,249 | GeForce RTX 3080 Ti |
GeForce RTX 3080 12GB | January 2022 | GA102 | 8960 | 1710 | 30,643 | $1,199 | GeForce RTX 3080 12GB |
GeForce RTX 3080 | September 2020 | GA102 | 8704 | 1710 | 29,768 | $699 | GeForce RTX 3080 |
Radeon RX 6950 XT | May 2022 | Navi 21 | 5120 | 2310 | 23,654 | $1,099 | Radeon RX 6950 XT |
Radeon RX 6900 XT | December 2020 | Navi 21 | 5120 | 2250 | 23,040 | $999 | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | June 2021 | GA104 | 6144 | 1770 | 21,750 | $599 | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti |
Radeon RX 6800 XT | November 2020 | Navi 21 | 4608 | 2250 | 20,736 | $649 | Radeon RX 6800 XT |
GeForce RTX 3070 | October 2020 | GA104 | 5888 | 1725 | 20,314 | $499 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
Intel Arc A770 16GB | October 2022 | ACM-G10 | 4096 | 2100 | 17,203 | $349 | Intel Arc A770 16GB |
Intel Arc A770 8GB | October 2022 | ACM-G10 | 4096 | 2100 | 17,203 | $329 | Intel Arc A770 8GB |
Nvidia Titan RTX | December 2018 | TU102 | 4608 | 1770 | 16,312 | $2,499 | Nvidia Titan RTX |
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | December 2020 | GA104 | 4864 | 1665 | 16,197 | $399 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
Radeon RX 6800 | November 2020 | Navi 21 | 3840 | 2105 | 16,166 | $579 | Radeon RX 6800 |
Nvidia Titan V | December 2017 | GV100 | 5120 | 1455 | 14,899 | $2,999 | Nvidia Titan V |
Intel Arc A750 | October 2022 | ACM-G10 | 3584 | 2050 | 14,694 | $289 | Intel Arc A750 |
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | September 2018 | TU102 | 4352 | 1545 | 13,448 | $1,199 | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
Radeon VII | February 2019 | Vega 20 | 3840 | 1750 | 13,440 | $699 | Radeon VII |
Radeon RX 6750 XT | May 2022 | Navi 22 | 2560 | 2600 | 13,312 | $549 | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
Radeon RX 6700 XT | March 2021 | Navi 22 | 2560 | 2581 | 13,215 | $479 | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
GeForce RTX 3060 | February 2021 | GA106 | 3584 | 1777 | 12,738 | $329 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
Radeon RX Vega 64 | August 2017 | Vega 10 | 4096 | 1546 | 12,665 | $499 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
Radeon R9 295X2 | April 2014 | Vesuvius (x2) | 5632 | 1018 | 11,467 | $1,499 | Radeon R9 295X2 |
Nvidia Titan Xp | April 2017 | GP102 | 3840 | 1480 | 11,366 | $1,199 | Nvidia Titan Xp |
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | March 2017 | GP102 | 3584 | 1582 | 11,340 | $699 | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti |
GeForce RTX 2080 Super | July 2019 | TU104 | 3072 | 1815 | 11,151 | $699 | GeForce RTX 2080 Super |
Nvidia Titan X (Pascal) | August 2016 | GP102 | 3584 | 1531 | 10,974 | $1,199 | Nvidia Titan X (Pascal) |
Radeon RX 6650 XT | May 2022 | Navi 23 | 2048 | 2635 | 10,793 | $399 | Radeon RX 6650 XT |
Radeon RX 6600 XT | August 2021 | Navi 23 | 2048 | 2589 | 10,605 | $379 | Radeon RX 6600 XT |
Radeon RX Vega 56 | August 2017 | Vega 10 | 3584 | 1471 | 10,544 | $399 | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
GeForce GTX Titan Z | May 2014 | 2x GK110 | 5760 | 876 | 10,092 | $2,999 | GeForce GTX Titan Z |
GeForce RTX 2080 | September 2018 | TU104 | 2944 | 1710 | 10,068 | $699 | GeForce RTX 2080 |
Radeon RX 5700 XT | July 2019 | Navi 10 | 2560 | 1905 | 9,754 | $399 | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
GeForce RTX 3050 | January 2022 | GA106 | 2560 | 1777 | 9,098 | $249 | GeForce RTX 3050 |
GeForce RTX 2070 Super | July 2019 | TU104 | 2560 | 1770 | 9,062 | $499 | GeForce RTX 2070 Super |
Radeon RX 6600 | October 2021 | Navi 23 | 1792 | 2491 | 8,928 | $329 | Radeon RX 6600 |
GeForce GTX 1080 | May 2016 | GP104 | 2560 | 1733 | 8,873 | $599 ($499) | GeForce GTX 1080 |
Radeon R9 Fury X | June 2015 | Fiji | 4096 | 1050 | 8,602 | $649 | Radeon R9 Fury X |
Radeon R9 Nano | August 2015 | Fiji | 4096 | 1000 | 8,192 | $649 | Radeon R9 Nano |
Radeon HD 7990 | April 2013 | New Zealand (x2) | 4096 | 1000 | 8,192 | $1,000 | Radeon HD 7990 |
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | November 2017 | GP104 | 2432 | 1683 | 8,186 | $449 | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti |
Radeon RX 5600 XT | January 2020 | Navi 10 | 2304 | 1750 | 8,064 | $279 | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
Radeon RX 5700 | July 2019 | Navi 10 | 2304 | 1725 | 7,949 | $249 | Radeon RX 5700 |
GeForce RTX 2070 | October 2018 | TU106 | 2304 | 1620 | 7,465 | $499 | GeForce RTX 2070 |
GeForce RTX 2060 Super | July 2019 | TU106 | 2176 | 1650 | 7,181 | $399 | GeForce RTX 2060 Super |
Radeon R9 Fury | July 2015 | Fiji | 3584 | 1000 | 7,168 | $549 | Radeon R9 Fury |
Radeon RX 590 | November 2018 | Polaris 30 | 2304 | 1545 | 7,119 | $279 | Radeon RX 590 |
GeForce GTX Titan X (Maxwell) | March 2015 | GM200 | 3072 | 1075 | 6,605 | $999 | GeForce GTX Titan X (Maxwell) |
GeForce GTX 1070 | June 2016 | GP104 | 1920 | 1683 | 6,463 | $379 | GeForce GTX 1070 |
GeForce RTX 2060 | January 2019 | TU106 | 1920 | 1680 | 6,451 | $349 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
GeForce GTX 690 | April 2012 | 2x GK104 | 3072 | 1019 | 6,261 | $1,000 | GeForce GTX 690 |
Radeon RX 580 8GB | April 2017 | Polaris 20 | 2304 | 1340 | 6,175 | $229 | Radeon RX 580 8GB |
Radeon RX 580 4GB | April 2017 | Polaris 20 | 2304 | 1340 | 6,175 | $199 | Radeon RX 580 4GB |
GeForce GTX 980 Ti | June 2015 | GM200 | 2816 | 1075 | 6,054 | $649 | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
Radeon R9 390X | June 2015 | Grenada | 2816 | 1050 | 5,914 | $429 | Radeon R9 390X |
Radeon RX 480 8GB | June 2016 | Ellesmere | 2304 | 1266 | 5,834 | $239 | Radeon RX 480 8GB |
Radeon RX 480 4GB | June 2016 | Ellesmere | 2304 | 1266 | 5,834 | $199 | Radeon RX 480 4GB |
Radeon RX 6500 XT | January 2022 | Navi 24 | 1024 | 2815 | 5,765 | $199 | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
GeForce GTX Titan Black | February 2014 | GK110 | 2880 | 980 | 5,645 | $999 | GeForce GTX Titan Black |
Radeon R9 290X | October 2013 | Hawaii | 2816 | 1000 | 5,632 | $549 | Radeon R9 290X |
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | February 2019 | TU116 | 1536 | 1770 | 5,437 | $279 | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
GeForce GTX 780 Ti | November 2013 | GK110 | 2880 | 928 | 5,345 | $699 | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB | December 2019 | Navi 14 | 1408 | 1845 | 5,196 | $199 | Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB |
Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB | December 2019 | Navi 14 | 1408 | 1845 | 5,196 | $169 | Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB |
Radeon R9 390 | June 2015 | Grenada | 2560 | 1000 | 5,120 | $329 | Radeon R9 390 |
Radeon HD 6990 | March 2011 | Antilles (2x) | 3072 | 830 | 5,100 | $699 | Radeon HD 6990 |
Radeon RX 570 8GB | April 2017 | Polaris 20 | 2048 | 1244 | 5,095 | $199 | Radeon RX 570 8GB |
Radeon RX 570 4GB | April 2017 | Polaris 20 | 2048 | 1244 | 5,095 | $169 | Radeon RX 570 4GB |
GeForce GTX 1660 Super | October 2019 | TU116 | 1408 | 1785 | 5,027 | $229 | GeForce GTX 1660 Super |
GeForce GTX 980 | September 2014 | GM204 | 2048 | 1216 | 4,981 | $549 | GeForce GTX 980 |
Radeon RX 470 4GB | August 2016 | Ellesmere | 2048 | 1206 | 4,940 | $179 | Radeon RX 470 4GB |
GeForce GTX 1660 | March 2019 | TU116 | 1408 | 1725 | 4,858 | $219 | GeForce GTX 1660 |
Radeon R9 290 | November 2013 | Hawaii | 2560 | 947 | 4,849 | $399 | Radeon R9 290 |
GeForce GTX Titan | February 2013 | GK110 | 2688 | 876 | 4,709 | $999 | GeForce GTX Titan |
Radeon HD 5970 | November 2009 | Hemlock (2x) | 3200 | 725 | 4,640 | $599 | Radeon HD 5970 |
GeForce GTX 1060 6GB | July 2016 | GP106 | 1280 | 1708 | 4,372 | $249 | GeForce GTX 1060 6GB |
Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition | June 2012 | Tahiti | 2048 | 1050 | 4,301 | $500 | Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition |
GeForce GTX 780 | May 2013 | GK110 | 2304 | 900 | 4,147 | $649 ($499) | GeForce GTX 780 |
Radeon R9 280X | August 2013 | Tahiti | 2048 | 1000 | 4,096 | $299 | Radeon R9 280X |
Intel Arc A380 | June 2022 | ACM-G11 | 1024 | 2000 | 4,096 | $139 | Intel Arc A380 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Super | November 2019 | TU116 | 1280 | 1590 | 4,070 | $159 | GeForce GTX 1650 Super |
Radeon R9 380X | November 2015 | Tonga | 2048 | 970 | 3,973 | $229 | Radeon R9 380X |
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | August 2016 | GP106 | 1152 | 1708 | 3,935 | $199 | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
GeForce GTX 970 | September 2014 | GM204 | 1664 | 1178 | 3,920 | $329 | GeForce GTX 970 |
Radeon R9 380 | June 2015 | Tonga | 1792 | 970 | 3,476 | $199 | Radeon R9 380 |
Radeon R9 280 | March 2014 | Tahiti | 1792 | 933 | 3,344 | $249 | Radeon R9 280 |
GeForce GTX 770 | May 2013 | GK104 | 1536 | 1085 | 3,333 | $399 ($329) | GeForce GTX 770 |
Radeon R9 285 | September 2014 | Tonga | 1792 | 918 | 3,290 | $249 | Radeon R9 285 |
GeForce GTX 680 | March 2012 | GK104 | 1536 | 1058 | 3,250 | $500 | GeForce GTX 680 |
Radeon HD 7870 XT | November 2012 | Tahiti | 1536 | 975 | 2,995 | $270 | Radeon HD 7870 XT |
GeForce GTX 1650 | April 2019 | TU117 | 896 | 1665 | 2,984 | $149 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
Radeon HD 7950 | January 2012 | Tahiti | 1792 | 800 | 2,867 | $450 | Radeon HD 7950 |
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 | April 2020 | TU117 | 896 | 1590 | 2,849 | $149 | GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 |
Radeon HD 5870 | September 2009 | Cypress | 1600 | 850 | 2,720 | $379 | Radeon HD 5870 |
Radeon HD 6970 | December 2010 | Cayman | 1536 | 880 | 2,703 | $369 | Radeon HD 6970 |
Radeon R9 270X | August 2013 | Pitcairn | 1280 | 1050 | 2,688 | $199 | Radeon R9 270X |
GeForce GTX 760 Ti | September 2013 | GK104 | 1344 | 980 | 2,634 | OEM | GeForce GTX 760 Ti |
GeForce GTX 670 | May 2012 | GK104 | 1344 | 980 | 2,634 | $400 | GeForce GTX 670 |
GeForce GTX 660 Ti | August 2012 | GK104 | 1344 | 980 | 2,634 | $300 | GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
Radeon RX 560 4GB | May 2017 | Baffin | 1024 | 1275 | 2,611 | $99 | Radeon RX 560 4GB |
Radeon R9 370X | August 2015 | Pitcairn | 1280 | 1000 | 2,560 | $179 | Radeon R9 370X |
Radeon HD 7870 | March 2012 | Pitcairn | 1280 | 1000 | 2,560 | $350 | Radeon HD 7870 |
GeForce GTX 590 | March 2011 | 2x GF110 | 1024 | 607 | 2,486 | $699 | GeForce GTX 590 |
GeForce GTX 960 | January 2015 | GM206 | 1024 | 1178 | 2,413 | $199 | GeForce GTX 960 |
Radeon HD 4870 X2 | August 2008 | 2x RV770 | 1600 | 750 | 2,400 | $449 | Radeon HD 4870 X2 |
GeForce GTX 760 | June 2013 | GK104 | 1152 | 1033 | 2,380 | $249 | GeForce GTX 760 |
Radeon R9 270 | November 2013 | Pitcairn | 1280 | 925 | 2,368 | $179 | Radeon R9 270 |
Radeon HD 6950 2GB | December 2010 | Cayman | 1408 | 800 | 2,253 | $299 | Radeon HD 6950 2GB |
Radeon HD 6950 1GB | December 2010 | Cayman | 1408 | 800 | 2,253 | $259 | Radeon HD 6950 1GB |
Radeon RX 460 4GB | August 2016 | Baffin | 896 | 1200 | 2,150 | $139 | Radeon RX 460 4GB |
Radeon RX 460 2GB | August 2016 | Baffin | 896 | 1200 | 2,150 | $109 | Radeon RX 460 2GB |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | October 2016 | GP107 | 768 | 1392 | 2,138 | $139 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
Radeon RX 560 4GB | October 2017 | Baffin | 896 | 1175 | 2,106 | $99 | Radeon RX 560 4GB |
Radeon HD 5850 | September 2009 | Cypress | 1440 | 725 | 2,088 | $259 | Radeon HD 5850 |
Radeon HD 6870 | October 2010 | Barts | 1120 | 900 | 2,016 | $239 | Radeon HD 6870 |
Radeon HD 4850 X2 | November 2008 | 2x RV770 | 1600 | 625 | 2,000 | $339 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
Radeon R9 370 | June 2015 | Pitcairn | 1024 | 975 | 1,997 | $149 | Radeon R9 370 |
GeForce GTX 660 | September 2012 | GK106 | 960 | 1032 | 1,981 | $230 | GeForce GTX 660 |
Radeon R7 260X | August 2013 | Bonaire | 896 | 1100 | 1,971 | $139 | Radeon R7 260X |
GeForce GTX 1050 | October 2016 | GP107 | 640 | 1518 | 1,943 | $109 | GeForce GTX 1050 |
Radeon R7 265 | February 2014 | Pitcairn | 1024 | 925 | 1,894 | $149 | Radeon R7 265 |
GeForce GTX 950 | August 2015 | GM206 | 768 | 1188 | 1,825 | $159 | GeForce GTX 950 |
Radeon HD 7790 | March 2013 | Pitcairn | 896 | 1000 | 1,792 | $150 | Radeon HD 7790 |
Radeon HD 5830 | February 2010 | Cypress | 1120 | 800 | 1,792 | $239 | Radeon HD 5830 |
Radeon HD 7850 | March 2012 | Pitcairn | 1024 | 860 | 1,761 | $250 | Radeon HD 7850 |
Radeon R7 360 | June 2015 | Bonaire | 768 | 1050 | 1,613 | $109 | Radeon R7 360 |
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | March 2013 | GK106 | 768 | 1032 | 1,585 | $170 | GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost |
GeForce GTX 580 | November 2010 | GF110 | 512 | 772 | 1,581 | $499 | GeForce GTX 580 |
Radeon R7 260 | December 2013 | Bonaire | 768 | 1000 | 1,536 | $109 | Radeon R7 260 |
Radeon RX 550 | April 2017 | Lexa | 640 | 1183 | 1,514 | $79 | Radeon RX 550 |
Radeon HD 6850 | October 2010 | Barts | 960 | 775 | 1,488 | $179 | Radeon HD 6850 |
GeForce GTX 650 Ti | October 2012 | GK106 | 768 | 928 | 1,425 | $150 | GeForce GTX 650 Ti |
GeForce GTX 570 | December 2010 | GF110 | 480 | 732 | 1,405 | $349 | GeForce GTX 570 |
GeForce GTX 750 Ti | February 2014 | GK107 | 640 | 1085 | 1,389 | $149 | GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
Radeon HD 6770 | April 2011 | Juniper | 800 | 850 | 1,360 | $129 | Radeon HD 6770 |
Radeon HD 5770 | October 2009 | Juniper | 800 | 850 | 1,360 | $159 | Radeon HD 5770 |
Radeon HD 4890 | April 2009 | RV790 | 800 | 850 | 1,360 | $249 | Radeon HD 4890 |
GeForce GTX 480 | March 2010 | GF100 | 480 | 701 | 1,346 | $499 | GeForce GTX 480 |
Radeon HD 6790 | April 2011 | Barts | 800 | 840 | 1,344 | $149 | Radeon HD 6790 |
GeForce GTX 560 Ti (448 Core) | November 2011 | GF110 | 448 | 732 | 1,312 | $289 | GeForce GTX 560 Ti (448 Core) |
Radeon HD 7770 | February 2012 | Cape Verde | 640 | 1000 | 1,280 | $160 | Radeon HD 7770 |
GeForce GTX 560 Ti | January 2011 | GF114 | 384 | 822 | 1,263 | $249 | GeForce GTX 560 Ti |
Radeon HD 4870 | June 2008 | RV770 | 800 | 750 | 1,200 | $299 | Radeon HD 4870 |
GeForce GT 1030 (GDDR5) | May 2017 | GP108 | 384 | 1468 | 1,127 | $70 | GeForce GT 1030 (GDDR5) |
GeForce GTX 750 | February 2014 | GK107 | 512 | 1085 | 1,111 | $119 | GeForce GTX 750 |
GeForce GTX 470 | March 2010 | GF100 | 448 | 608 | 1,090 | $349 | GeForce GTX 470 |
GeForce GTX 560 | May 2011 | GF114 | 336 | 810 | 1,089 | $199 | GeForce GTX 560 |
GeForce GT 1030 (DDR4) | March 2018 | GP108 | 384 | 1379 | 1,059 | $79 | GeForce GT 1030 (DDR4) |
Radeon HD 3870 X2 | January 2008 | 2x R680 | 640 | 825 | 1,056 | $449 | Radeon HD 3870 X2 |
Radeon HD 6750 | January 2011 | Juniper | 720 | 700 | 1,008 | OEM | Radeon HD 6750 |
Radeon HD 5750 | October 2009 | Juniper | 720 | 700 | 1,008 | $129 | Radeon HD 5750 |
Radeon HD 4850 | June 2008 | RV770 | 800 | 625 | 1,000 | $199 | Radeon HD 4850 |
Radeon HD 4770 | April 2009 | RV740 | 640 | 750 | 960 | $109 | Radeon HD 4770 |
Radeon R7 350 | February 2016 | Cape Verde | 512 | 925 | 947 | $89 | Radeon R7 350 |
Radeon HD 7750 (GDDR5) | February 2012 | Cape Verde | 512 | 900 | 922 | $110 | Radeon HD 7750 (GDDR5) |
Radeon HD 7750 (DDR3) | February 2012 | Cape Verde | 512 | 900 | 922 | $110 | Radeon HD 7750 (DDR3) |
GeForce GTX 460 (256-bit) | July 2010 | GF104 | 336 | 675 | 907 | $229 | GeForce GTX 460 (256-bit) |
GeForce GTX 460 (192-bit) | July 2010 | GF104 | 336 | 675 | 907 | $199 | GeForce GTX 460 (192-bit) |
GeForce GTX 465 | May 2010 | GF100 | 352 | 608 | 856 | $279 | GeForce GTX 465 |
GeForce GTX 560 SE | February 2012 | GF114 | 288 | 736 | 848 | OEM | GeForce GTX 560 SE |
Radeon R7 250E | December 2013 | Cape Verde | 512 | 800 | 819 | $109 | Radeon R7 250E |
GeForce GTX 650 | September 2012 | GK107 | 384 | 1058 | 813 | $110 | GeForce GTX 650 |
Radeon R7 250 (GDDR5) | August 2013 | Oland | 384 | 1050 | 806 | $99 | Radeon R7 250 (GDDR5) |
Radeon R7 250 (DDR3) | August 2013 | Oland | 384 | 1050 | 806 | $89 | Radeon R7 250 (DDR3) |
Radeon HD 6670 (GDDR5) | April 2011 | Turks | 480 | 800 | 768 | $109 | Radeon HD 6670 (GDDR5) |
Radeon HD 6670 (DDR3) | April 2011 | Turks | 480 | 800 | 768 | $99 | Radeon HD 6670 (DDR3) |
GeForce 9800 GX2 | March 2008 | 2x G92 | 256 | 1500 | 768 | GeForce 9800 GX2 | |
GeForce GT 740 (GDDR5) | May 2014 | GK107 | 384 | 993 | 763 | $99 | GeForce GT 740 (GDDR5) |
GeForce GT 740 (DDR3) | May 2014 | GK107 | 384 | 993 | 763 | $89 | GeForce GT 740 (DDR3) |
GeForce GTX 460 SE | November 2010 | GF104 | 288 | 650 | 749 | $160 | GeForce GTX 460 SE |
Radeon HD 4830 | October 2008 | RV770 | 640 | 575 | 736 | $130 | Radeon HD 4830 |
GeForce GT 640 (GDDR5) | April 2012 | GK107 | 384 | 950 | 730 | OEM | GeForce GT 640 (GDDR5) |
GeForce GT 730 (64-bit, GDDR5) | June 2014 | GK208 | 384 | 902 | 693 | $79 | GeForce GT 730 (64-bit, GDDR5) |
GeForce GT 730 (64-bit, DDR3) | June 2014 | GK208 | 384 | 902 | 693 | $69 | GeForce GT 730 (64-bit, DDR3) |
GeForce GTX 550 Ti | March 2011 | GF116 | 192 | 900 | 691 | $149 | GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
Radeon HD 6570 (GDDR5) | April 2011 | Turks | 480 | 650 | 624 | $89 | Radeon HD 6570 (GDDR5) |
Radeon HD 6570 (DDR3) | April 2011 | Turks | 480 | 650 | 624 | $79 | Radeon HD 6570 (DDR3) |
Radeon HD 5670 | January 2010 | Redwood | 400 | 775 | 620 | $99 | Radeon HD 5670 |
Radeon HD 7730 (GDDR5) | April 2013 | Cape Verde | 384 | 800 | 614 | $60 | Radeon HD 7730 (GDDR5) |
Radeon HD 7730 (DDR3) | April 2013 | Cape Verde | 384 | 800 | 614 | $60 | Radeon HD 7730 (DDR3) |
GeForce GT 640 (DDR3) | April 2012 | GK107 | 384 | 797 | 612 | OEM | GeForce GT 640 (DDR3) |
GeForce GTS 450 | September 2010 | GF106 | 192 | 783 | 601 | $129 | GeForce GTS 450 |
GeForce GTX 295 | January 2009 | 2x GT200 | 480 | 576 | 553 | $500 | GeForce GTX 295 |
Radeon HD 5570 (GDDR5) | February 2010 | Redwood | 400 | 650 | 520 | $80 | Radeon HD 5570 (GDDR5) |
Radeon HD 5570 (DDR3) | February 2010 | Redwood | 400 | 650 | 520 | $80 | Radeon HD 5570 (DDR3) |
GeForce GT 545 (GDDR5) | May 2011 | GF116 | 144 | 870 | 501 | OEM | GeForce GT 545 (GDDR5) |
Radeon R7 240 | August 2013 | Oland | 320 | 780 | 499 | $69 | Radeon R7 240 |
Radeon HD 3870 | November 2007 | RV670 | 320 | 777 | 497 | $349 | Radeon HD 3870 |
Radeon HD 4670 | September 2008 | RV730 | 320 | 750 | 480 | $79 | Radeon HD 4670 |
Radeon HD 2900 XT | May 2007 | R600 | 320 | 743 | 476 | $399 | Radeon HD 2900 XT |
GeForce GTS 250 | March 2009 | G92b | 128 | 1836 | 470 | $150 | GeForce GTS 250 |
GeForce 9800 GTX+ | July 2008 | G92b | 128 | 1836 | 470 | GeForce 9800 GTX+ | |
GeForce 9800 GTX | April 2008 | G92 | 128 | 1688 | 432 | GeForce 9800 GTX | |
Radeon HD 3850 (512MB) | November 2007 | RV670 | 320 | 668 | 428 | $189 | Radeon HD 3850 (512MB) |
Radeon HD 3850 (256MB) | November 2007 | RV670 | 320 | 668 | 428 | $179 | Radeon HD 3850 (256MB) |
Radeon HD 3830 | April 2008 | RV670 | 320 | 668 | 428 | $129 | Radeon HD 3830 |
Radeon HD 4650 (DDR3) | September 2008 | RV730 | 320 | 650 | 416 | Radeon HD 4650 (DDR3) | |
GeForce 8800 GTS (512MB) | December 2007 | G92 | 128 | 1625 | 416 | GeForce 8800 GTS (512MB) | |
GeForce GT 545 (DDR3) | May 2011 | GF116 | 144 | 720 | 415 | $149 | GeForce GT 545 (DDR3) |
Radeon HD 4650 (DDR2) | September 2008 | RV730 | 320 | 600 | 384 | Radeon HD 4650 (DDR2) | |
Radeon HD 2900 Pro | September 2007 | R600 | 320 | 600 | 384 | $300 | Radeon HD 2900 Pro |
GeForce 8800 Ultra | May 2007 | G80 | 128 | 1500 | 384 | GeForce 8800 Ultra | |
Radeon HD 5550 (GDDR5) | February 2010 | Redwood | 320 | 550 | 352 | $70 | Radeon HD 5550 (GDDR5) |
Radeon HD 5550 (DDR3) | February 2010 | Redwood | 320 | 550 | 352 | $70 | Radeon HD 5550 (DDR3) |
Radeon HD 5550 (DDR2) | February 2010 | Redwood | 320 | 550 | 352 | $70 | Radeon HD 5550 (DDR2) |
GeForce 8800 GTX | November 2006 | G80 | 128 | 1350 | 346 | GeForce 8800 GTX | |
GeForce GT 630 (DDR3) | April 2012 | GK107 | 192 | 875 | 336 | OEM | GeForce GT 630 (DDR3) |
GeForce 9800 GT | July 2008 | G92a/G92b | 112 | 1500 | 336 | GeForce 9800 GT | |
GeForce 8800 GT (512MB) | October 2007 | G92 | 112 | 1500 | 336 | GeForce 8800 GT (512MB) | |
GeForce 8800 GT (256MB) | December 2007 | G92 | 112 | 1500 | 336 | GeForce 8800 GT (256MB) | |
GeForce GTX 285 | January 2009 | GT200 | 240 | 648 | 311 | $400 | GeForce GTX 285 |
GeForce GT 630 (GDDR5) | May 2012 | GF108 | 96 | 810 | 311 | $80 | GeForce GT 630 (GDDR5) |
GeForce GT 440 (GDDR5) | February 2011 | GF108 | 96 | 810 | 311 | $100 | GeForce GT 440 (GDDR5) |
GeForce GT 440 (GDDR3) | February 2011 | GF108 | 96 | 810 | 311 | $100 | GeForce GT 440 (GDDR3) |
GeForce GTX 275 | April 2009 | GT200 | 240 | 633 | 304 | $250 | GeForce GTX 275 |
GeForce GTX 280 | June 2008 | GT200 | 240 | 602 | 289 | $650 ($430) | GeForce GTX 280 |
Radeon HD 2900 GT | November 2007 | R600 | 240 | 600 | 288 | $200 | Radeon HD 2900 GT |
GeForce GT 730 (128-bit, DDR3) | June 2014 | GF108 | 96 | 700 | 269 | $69 | GeForce GT 730 (128-bit, DDR3) |
GeForce GT 530 | May 2011 | GF118 | 96 | 700 | 269 | OEM | GeForce GT 530 |
GeForce GT 430 | October 2010 | GF108 | 96 | 700 | 269 | $79 | GeForce GT 430 |
GeForce 9600 GSO | May 2008 | G92 | 96 | 1375 | 264 | GeForce 9600 GSO | |
GeForce 8800 GS | January 2008 | G92 | 96 | 1375 | 264 | GeForce 8800 GS | |
GeForce GT 240 (GDDR5) | November 2009 | GT215 | 96 | 1340 | 257 | OEM | GeForce GT 240 (GDDR5) |
GeForce GT 240 (DDR3) | November 2009 | GT215 | 96 | 1340 | 257 | OEM | GeForce GT 240 (DDR3) |
GeForce GTX 260 | September 2008 | GT200 | 216 | 576 | 249 | $300 | GeForce GTX 260 |
Radeon HD 6450 | April 2011 | Caicos | 160 | 750 | 240 | $55 | Radeon HD 6450 |
GeForce 8800 GTS (640MB) | November 2006 | G80 | 96 | 1188 | 228 | GeForce 8800 GTS (640MB) | |
GeForce 8800 GTS (320MB) | February 2007 | G80 | 96 | 1188 | 228 | GeForce 8800 GTS (320MB) | |
GeForce GTX 260 | June 2008 | GT200 | 192 | 576 | 221 | $400 ($270) | GeForce GTX 260 |
GeForce 9600 GT | February 2008 | G94 | 64 | 1625 | 208 | GeForce 9600 GT | |
Radeon R5 230 | April 2014 | Caicos | 160 | 625 | 200 | Radeon R5 230 | |
Radeon HD 2600 XT | June 2007 | RV630 | 120 | 800 | 192 | $149 | Radeon HD 2600 XT |
Radeon HD 3650 (DDR3) | January 2008 | RV635 | 120 | 725 | 174 | Radeon HD 3650 (DDR3) | |
Radeon HD 3650 (DDR2) | January 2008 | RV635 | 120 | 725 | 174 | Radeon HD 3650 (DDR2) | |
GeForce GT 520 | April 2011 | GF119 | 48 | 810 | 156 | $59 | GeForce GT 520 |
Radeon HD 2600 Pro | June 2007 | RV630 | 120 | 600 | 144 | $99 | Radeon HD 2600 Pro |
GeForce GT 220 (DDR3) | October 2009 | GT216 | 48 | 1360 | 131 | OEM | GeForce GT 220 (DDR3) |
GeForce GT 220 (DDR2) | October 2009 | GT216 | 48 | 1335 | 128 | OEM | GeForce GT 220 (DDR2) |
Radeon HD 5450 | February 2010 | Cedar | 80 | 650 | 104 | $50 | Radeon HD 5450 |
Radeon HD 4550 | September 2008 | RV710 | 80 | 600 | 96 | Radeon HD 4550 | |
Radeon HD 4350 | September 2008 | RV710 | 80 | 600 | 96 | Radeon HD 4350 | |
GeForce 8600 GTS | April 2007 | G84 | 32 | 1450 | 93 | GeForce 8600 GTS | |
GeForce 9500 GT (GDDR3) | July 2008 | G96 | 32 | 1400 | 90 | GeForce 9500 GT (GDDR3) | |
GeForce 9500 GT (DDR2) | July 2008 | G96 | 32 | 1400 | 90 | GeForce 9500 GT (DDR2) | |
GeForce 8600 GT (GDDR3) | April 2007 | G84 | 32 | 1188 | 76 | GeForce 8600 GT (GDDR3) | |
GeForce 8600 GT (DDR2) | April 2007 | G84 | 32 | 1188 | 76 | GeForce 8600 GT (DDR2) | |
GeForce GT 420 | September 2010 | GF108 | 48 | 700 | 67 | OEM | GeForce GT 420 |
Radeon HD 2400 XT | June 2007 | RV610 | 40 | 650 | 52 | $55 | Radeon HD 2400 XT |
GeForce 9400 GT | August 2008 | G96 | 16 | 1400 | 45 | GeForce 9400 GT | |
Radeon HD 2400 Pro | June 2007 | RV610 | 40 | 525 | 42 | Radeon HD 2400 Pro | |
Radeon HD 2300 | June 2007 | RV610 | 40 | 525 | 42 | Radeon HD 2300 | |
GeForce 8600 GS | April 2007 | G84 | 16 | 1180 | 38 | GeForce 8600 GS | |
Radeon X1950 XTX * | October 2006 | R580+ | 48 | 650 | 31.2 | $449 | Radeon X1950 XTX * |
Radeon X1900 XTX * | January 2006 | R580 | 48 | 650 | 31.2 | $649 | Radeon X1900 XTX * |
Radeon X1950 XT * | October 2006 | R580+ | 48 | 625 | 30.0 | Radeon X1950 XT * | |
Radeon X1900 XT * | January 2006 | R580 | 48 | 625 | 30.0 | $549 | Radeon X1900 XT * |
GeForce 8500 GT | April 2007 | G86 | 16 | 900 | 29 | GeForce 8500 GT | |
GeForce 8400 GS | June 2007 | G86 | 16 | 900 | 29 | GeForce 8400 GS | |
GeForce 7950 GX2 * | June 2006 | 2x G71 | 48 | 500 | 24.0 | GeForce 7950 GX2 * | |
GeForce 9300 GS | June 2008 | G98 | 8 | 1400 | 22 | GeForce 9300 GS | |
GeForce 9300 GE | June 2008 | G98 | 8 | 1300 | 21 | GeForce 9300 GE | |
Radeon X1950 Pro * | October 2006 | RV570 | 36 | 575 | 20.7 | Radeon X1950 Pro * | |
Radeon X1900 GT * | May 2006 | R580 | 36 | 575 | 20.7 | Radeon X1900 GT * | |
Radeon X1950 GT * | January 2007 | RV570 | 36 | 500 | 18.0 | Radeon X1950 GT * | |
GeForce 7900 GTX * | March 2006 | G71 | 24 | 650 | 15.6 | GeForce 7900 GTX * | |
GeForce 7900 GTO * | October 2006 | G71 | 24 | 650 | 15.6 | GeForce 7900 GTO * | |
GeForce 8300 GS | July 2007 | G86 | 8 | 900 | 14 | GeForce 8300 GS | |
GeForce 7950 GT * | September 2006 | G71 | 24 | 550 | 13.2 | GeForce 7950 GT * | |
GeForce 7800 GTX (512MB) * | November 2005 | G70 | 24 | 550 | 13.2 | GeForce 7800 GTX (512MB) * | |
Radeon X1650 XT * | October 2006 | RV560 | 24 | 525 | 12.6 | Radeon X1650 XT * | |
GeForce 7900 GT * | March 2006 | G71 | 24 | 450 | 10.8 | GeForce 7900 GT * | |
GeForce 7800 GTX (256MB) * | June 2005 | G70 | 24 | 430 | 10.3 | GeForce 7800 GTX (256MB) * | |
Radeon X1800 XT * | October 2005 | R520 | 16 | 625 | 10.0 | $549 | Radeon X1800 XT * |
Radeon X1650 GT * | May 2007 | RV560 | 24 | 400 | 9.6 | Radeon X1650 GT * | |
GeForce 7900 GS * | May 2006 | G71 | 20 | 450 | 9.0 | GeForce 7900 GS * | |
Radeon X850 XT Platinum * | December 2004 | R480 | 16 | 540 | 8.6 | Radeon X850 XT Platinum * | |
Radeon X850 XT * | December 2004 | R480 | 16 | 520 | 8.3 | Radeon X850 XT * | |
Radeon X800 XT Platinum * | May 2004 | R423 | 16 | 520 | 8.3 | Radeon X800 XT Platinum * | |
Radeon X800 XT * | December 2004 | R423 | 16 | 500 | 8.0 | Radeon X800 XT * | |
Radeon X1800 XL * | October 2005 | R520 | 16 | 500 | 8.0 | Radeon X1800 XL * | |
GeForce 7800 GT * | August 2005 | G70 | 20 | 400 | 8.0 | GeForce 7800 GT * | |
Radeon X1650 Pro * | August 2006 | RV535 | 12 | 600 | 7.2 | Radeon X1650 Pro * | |
Radeon X1600 XT * | October 2005 | RV530 | 12 | 590 | 7.1 | Radeon X1600 XT * | |
GeForce 7600 GT * | March 2006 | G73 | 12 | 560 | 6.7 | GeForce 7600 GT * | |
Radeon X800 XL * | December 2004 | R430 | 16 | 400 | 6.4 | Radeon X800 XL * | |
GeForce 6800 Ultra * | June 2004 | NV45 | 16 | 400 | 6.4 | GeForce 6800 Ultra * | |
Radeon X850 Pro * | December 2004 | R480 | 12 | 507 | 6.1 | Radeon X850 Pro * | |
Radeon X1800 GTO * | March 2006 | R520 | 12 | 500 | 6.0 | $249 | Radeon X1800 GTO * |
Radeon X1600 Pro * | October 2005 | RV530 | 12 | 500 | 6.0 | Radeon X1600 Pro * | |
Radeon X1300 XT * | August 2006 | RV530 | 12 | 500 | 6.0 | Radeon X1300 XT * | |
GeForce 7800 GS * | February 2006 | G70 | 16 | 375 | 6.0 | GeForce 7800 GS * | |
Radeon X800 Pro * | May 2004 | R423 | 12 | 475 | 5.7 | Radeon X800 Pro * | |
GeForce 6800 GT * | June 2004 | NV45 | 16 | 350 | 5.6 | GeForce 6800 GT * | |
GeForce 6800 GS (PCIe) * | November 2005 | NV42 | 12 | 425 | 5.1 | GeForce 6800 GS (PCIe) * | |
Radeon X800 GTO (256MB) * | September 2005 | R423/R480 | 12 | 400 | 4.8 | Radeon X800 GTO (256MB) * | |
Radeon X800 GTO (128MB) * | September 2005 | R423/R480 | 12 | 400 | 4.8 | Radeon X800 GTO (128MB) * | |
GeForce 7600 GS * | March 2006 | G73 | 12 | 400 | 4.8 | GeForce 7600 GS * | |
Radeon X800 * | December 2004 | R430 | 12 | 392 | 4.7 | Radeon X800 * | |
GeForce 6800 GS (AGP) * | December 2005 | NV40 | 12 | 350 | 4.2 | GeForce 6800 GS (AGP) * | |
GeForce 6600 GT * | November 2004 | NV43 | 8 | 500 | 4.0 | GeForce 6600 GT * | |
GeForce 6800 * | November 2004 | NV41/NV42 | 12 | 325 | 3.9 | GeForce 6800 * | |
Radeon X800 GT * | December 2005 | R423/R480 | 8 | 475 | 3.8 | Radeon X800 GT * | |
Radeon X800 SE * | October 2004 | R420 | 8 | 425 | 3.4 | Radeon X800 SE * | |
Radeon X700 Pro * | December 2004 | RV410 | 8 | 425 | 3.4 | Radeon X700 Pro * | |
Radeon 9800 XT * | September 2003 | R360 | 8 | 412 | 3.3 | Radeon 9800 XT * | |
Radeon X700 * | September 2005 | RV410 | 8 | 400 | 3.2 | Radeon X700 * | |
Radeon 9800 Pro * | March 2003 | R350 | 8 | 380 | 3.0 | Radeon 9800 Pro * | |
GeForce 7300 GT (GDDR3) * | May 2006 | G73 | 8 | 350 | 2.8 | GeForce 7300 GT (GDDR3) * | |
GeForce 7300 GT (DDR2) * | May 2006 | G73 | 8 | 350 | 2.8 | GeForce 7300 GT (DDR2) * | |
Radeon 9800 SE (128-bit) * | March 2003 | R350 | 8 | 325 | 2.6 | Radeon 9800 SE (128-bit) * | |
Radeon 9800 * | March 2003 | R350 | 8 | 325 | 2.6 | Radeon 9800 * | |
Radeon 9700 Pro * | July 2002 | R300 | 8 | 325 | 2.6 | Radeon 9700 Pro * | |
GeForce 6800 XT * | September 2005 | NV42 | 8 | 325 | 2.6 | GeForce 6800 XT * | |
GeForce 6800 LE * | January 2005 | NV41/NV42 | 8 | 325 | 2.6 | GeForce 6800 LE * | |
Radeon X1300 Pro * | October 2005 | RV515 | 4 | 600 | 2.4 | Radeon X1300 Pro * | |
GeForce 6600 (128-bit) * | August 2004 | NV43 | 8 | 300 | 2.4 | GeForce 6600 (128-bit) * | |
Radeon 9700 * | October 2002 | R300 | 8 | 275 | 2.2 | Radeon 9700 * | |
Radeon 9500 Pro * | October 2002 | R300 | 8 | 275 | 2.2 | Radeon 9500 Pro * | |
GeForce 7300 GS * | January 2006 | G72 | 4 | 550 | 2.2 | GeForce 7300 GS * | |
Radeon X600 XT * | September 2004 | RV380 | 4 | 500 | 2.0 | Radeon X600 XT * | |
Radeon X1550 * | January 2007 | RV516 | 4 | 500 | 2.0 | Radeon X1550 * | |
Radeon 9600 XT * | September 2003 | RV360 | 4 | 500 | 2.0 | Radeon 9600 XT * | |
GeForce FX 5800 Ultra * | January 2003 | NV30 | 4 | 500 | 2.0 | GeForce FX 5800 Ultra * | |
GeForce FX 5950 Ultra * | October 2003 | NV38 | 4 | 475 | 1.9 | GeForce FX 5950 Ultra * | |
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra * | October 2003 | NV36 | 4 | 475 | 1.9 | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra * | |
GeForce FX 5900 Ultra * | May 2003 | NV35 | 4 | 450 | 1.8 | GeForce FX 5900 Ultra * | |
GeForce FX 5700 * | October 2003 | NV36 | 4 | 425 | 1.7 | GeForce FX 5700 * | |
Radeon X600 Pro * | September 2004 | RV370 | 4 | 400 | 1.6 | Radeon X600 Pro * | |
Radeon X600 Pro * | September 2004 | RV380 | 4 | 400 | 1.6 | Radeon X600 Pro * | |
Radeon X600 * | September 2004 | RV370 | 4 | 400 | 1.6 | Radeon X600 * | |
Radeon 9600 Pro * | March 2003 | RV350 | 4 | 400 | 1.6 | Radeon 9600 Pro * | |
GeForce FX 5900 XT * | December 2003 | NV35 | 4 | 390 | 1.6 | GeForce FX 5900 XT * | |
GeForce FX 5900 * | May 2003 | NV35 | 4 | 400 | 1.6 | GeForce FX 5900 * | |
GeForce FX 5800 * | January 2003 | NV30 | 4 | 400 | 1.6 | GeForce FX 5800 * | |
GeForce FX 5600 Ultra * | March 2003 | NV31 | 4 | 400 | 1.6 | GeForce FX 5600 Ultra * | |
Radeon 9800 SE (256-bit) * | March 2003 | R350 | 4 | 380 | 1.5 | Radeon 9800 SE (256-bit) * | |
GeForce 7300 LE * | March 2006 | G72 | 4 | 350 | 1.4 | GeForce 7300 LE * | |
GeForce 6200 TurboCache * | December 2004 | NV44 | 4 | 350 | 1.4 | GeForce 6200 TurboCache * | |
Radeon 9600 SE * | September 2003 | RV350 | 4 | 325 | 1.3 | Radeon 9600 SE * | |
Radeon 9600 * | September 2003 | RV350 | 4 | 325 | 1.3 | Radeon 9600 * | |
GeForce FX 5600 * | March 2003 | NV31 | 4 | 325 | 1.3 | GeForce FX 5600 * | |
GeForce FX 5200 Ultra * | March 2003 | NV34 | 4 | 325 | 1.3 | GeForce FX 5200 Ultra * | |
GeForce 6600 LE * | June 1905 | NV43 | 4 | 325 | 1.3 | GeForce 6600 LE * | |
Radeon X300 SE * | September 2004 | RV370 | 4 | 300 | 1.2 | Radeon X300 SE * | |
GeForce 6200 * | October 2004 | NV43 | 4 | 300 | 1.2 | GeForce 6200 * | |
GeForce 4 Ti4800 * | January 2003 | NV28 | 4 | 300 | 1.2 | GeForce 4 Ti4800 * | |
GeForce 4 Ti4600 * | February 2002 | NV25 | 4 | 300 | 1.2 | GeForce 4 Ti4600 * | |
Radeon 9500 * | October 2002 | R300 | 4 | 275 | 1.1 | Radeon 9500 * | |
Radeon 8500 * | August 2001 | R200 | 4 | 275 | 1.1 | Radeon 8500 * | |
GeForce FX 5500 * | March 2004 | NV34B | 4 | 270 | 1.1 | GeForce FX 5500 * | |
GeForce 4 Ti4800 SE * | January 2003 | NV28 | 4 | 275 | 1.1 | GeForce 4 Ti4800 SE * | |
GeForce 4 Ti4400 * | February 2002 | NV25 | 4 | 275 | 1.1 | GeForce 4 Ti4400 * | |
Radeon X1050 (128-bit) * | December 2006 | RV350 | 4 | 250 | 1.0 | Radeon X1050 (128-bit) * | |
Radeon 9550 * | January 2004 | RV350 | 4 | 250 | 1.0 | Radeon 9550 * | |
Radeon 9250 * | March 2004 | RV280 | 4 | 240 | 1.0 | Radeon 9250 * | |
Radeon 9200 * | April 2003 | RV280 | 4 | 250 | 1.0 | Radeon 9200 * | |
Radeon 9100 * | April 2003 | R200 | 4 | 250 | 1.0 | Radeon 9100 * | |
Radeon 9000 * | August 2002 | RV250 | 4 | 250 | 1.0 | Radeon 9000 * | |
GeForce FX 5700 LE * | March 2004 | NV36 | 4 | 250 | 1.0 | GeForce FX 5700 LE * | |
GeForce FX 5200 (64-bit) * | March 2003 | NV34 | 4 | 250 | 1.0 | GeForce FX 5200 (64-bit) * | |
GeForce FX 5200 (128-bit) * | March 2003 | NV34 | 4 | 250 | 1.0 | GeForce FX 5200 (128-bit) * | |
GeForce 4 Ti4200 * | April 2002 | NV25 | 4 | 250 | 1.0 | GeForce 4 Ti4200 * | |
GeForce 3 Ti500 * | October 2001 | NV20 | 4 | 240 | 1.0 | GeForce 3 Ti500 * | |
GeForce 2 Ultra * | August 2000 | NV16 | 4 | 250 | 1.0 | GeForce 2 Ultra * | |
GeForce 2 Ti * | October 2001 | NV15 | 4 | 250 | 1.0 | GeForce 2 Ti * | |
GeForce 7200 GS * | January 2006 | G72 | 2 | 450 | 0.9 | GeForce 7200 GS * | |
Radeon X300 * | September 2004 | RV370 | 4 | 200 | 0.8 | Radeon X300 * | |
Radeon 9200 SE * | March 2003 | RV280 | 4 | 200 | 0.8 | Radeon 9200 SE * | |
GeForce 3 * | February 2001 | NV20 | 4 | 200 | 0.8 | GeForce 3 * | |
GeForce 2 GTS * | April 2000 | NV15 | 4 | 200 | 0.8 | GeForce 2 GTS * | |
GeForce 3 Ti200 * | October 2001 | NV20 | 4 | 175 | 0.7 | GeForce 3 Ti200 * | |
Radeon 7500 * | August 2001 | RV200 | 2 | 290 | 0.6 | Radeon 7500 * | |
GeForce 4 MX460 * | February 2002 | NV17 | 2 | 300 | 0.6 | GeForce 4 MX460 * | |
GeForce 4 MX440 * | February 2002 | NV17 | 2 | 275 | 0.6 | GeForce 4 MX440 * | |
Rage Fury MAXX * | October 1999 | 2x ATI Rage | 4 | 125 | 0.5 | Rage Fury MAXX * | |
GeForce 4 MX420 * | February 2002 | NV17 | 2 | 250 | 0.5 | GeForce 4 MX420 * | |
GeForce 256 SDR * | October 1999 | NV10 | 4 | 120 | 0.5 | GeForce 256 SDR * | |
GeForce 256 DDR * | December 1999 | NV10 | 4 | 120 | 0.5 | GeForce 256 DDR * | |
GeForce 2 MX400 * | March 2001 | NV11 | 2 | 200 | 0.4 | GeForce 2 MX400 * | |
GeForce 2 MX200 * | March 2001 | NV11 | 2 | 175 | 0.4 | GeForce 2 MX200 * | |
Rage 128 Ultra * | August 1999 | ATI Rage | 2 | 130 | 0.3 | Rage 128 Ultra * | |
Rage 128 Pro * | August 1999 | ATI Rage | 2 | 125 | 0.3 | Rage 128 Pro * | |
Radeon SDR * | June 2000 | R100 | 2 | 166 | 0.3 | Radeon SDR * | |
Radeon LE * | May 2001 | R100 | 2 | 150 | 0.3 | Radeon LE * | |
Radeon DDR * | April 2000 | R100 | 2 | 166 | 0.3 | Radeon DDR * | |
Radeon 7200 SDR * | June 2000 | R100 | 2 | 166 | 0.3 | Radeon 7200 SDR * | |
Radeon 7200 DDR * | April 2000 | R100 | 2 | 166 | 0.3 | Radeon 7200 DDR * | |
Nvidia Riva TNT2 Ultra * | March 1999 | NV5 | 2 | 150 | 0.3 | Nvidia Riva TNT2 Ultra * | |
Nvidia Riva TNT2 Pro * | October 1999 | NV5 | 2 | 143 | 0.3 | Nvidia Riva TNT2 Pro * | |
Nvidia Riva TNT2 * | March 1999 | NV5 | 2 | 125 | 0.3 | Nvidia Riva TNT2 * | |
Rage 128 GL * | August 1998 | ATI Rage | 2 | 103 | 0.2 | Rage 128 GL * | |
Radeon 7000 * | February 2001 | RV100 | 1 | 183 | 0.2 | Radeon 7000 * | |
Nvidia Riva TNT * | June 1998 | NV4 | 2 | 90 | 0.2 | Nvidia Riva TNT * | |
Nvidia Riva 128 * | August 1997 | NV3 | 1 | 100 | 0.1 | Nvidia Riva 128 * |
* – Denotes performance measured in gigaoperations per second, as opposed to GFLOPS. Older GPU architectures without unified shader support aren’t directly comparable with newer architectures.
Finding Discounts on the Best Graphics Cards
With all the GPU shortages these days, you’re unlikely to see huge sales on a graphics card, but you may find some savings by checking out the latest Newegg promo codes, Best Buy promo codes and Micro Center coupon codes.
For even more information, check out our Graphics Card Buyer’s Guide.
MORE: Best Graphics Cards for Gaming
MORE: Graphics Card Power Consumption Tested
MORE: How to Stress-Test Graphics Cards (Like We Do)
MORE: CPU Benchmarks
Want to comment on this story? Let us know what you think in the Tom’s Hardware Forums.